A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed against SS Rajamouli’s upcoming movie, “RRR,” featuring Jr NTR and Ram Charan, in Telangana High Court as mentioned in rajkotupdates.news : rrr filed pil in telangana high court before release. The petitioner alleges that the film distorts facts related to Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem, legendary freedom fighters. This article will delve into the details of the PIL, the history of PILs, and the recent developments in the case.
Understanding PILs
A PIL is a legal tool that enables any member of the public, such as an NGO, social activist, or ordinary citizen, to file a lawsuit in a court of law. This mechanism is designed to ensure public participation in the judicial review of administrative actions that violate legal rights. PILs can be brought before any High Court or Supreme Court by individuals, groups, or institutions for the redressal of grievances and violations of rights. These include issues such as non-payment of wages, bonded labor matters, women’s rights, environmental pollution, and more.
In 2010, the Supreme Court of India established strict guidelines for courts when entertaining PILs to ensure that petitioners were acting with good intentions and not seeking redress for personal interests or private gain rajkotupdates.news : rrr filed pil in telangana high court before release. PILs can help safeguard the courts from being used by political pressure groups to stall legitimate administrative action or further their political objectives. Unfortunately, abuse of PILs is all too common and has often resulted in delays or even quashing of genuine cases.
The PIL Against RRR
A woman from the West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh has filed a PIL against SS Rajamouli’s upcoming film RRR, alleging that it distorts the history of Legendary Freedom Fighters Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem with the intent to hurt their feelings. She demands that both censor certificates be refused, and a stay be placed on its release. According to the petitioner, the film depicts them as British police officers, which goes against their lifestyle and hurts the feelings of thousands of their followers.
The PIL was heard on March 15 by a two-judge bench consisting of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavali, who dismissed the PIL, stating that nothing could harm the reputations of great personalities like Alluri Sitarama Raju or Konar Ramaraju. They held that “Poison may kill Socrates, but not his ideas or literature.” Furthermore, the judges urged the makers to take appropriate steps to avoid any controversy during the film’s release and requested that the censor board ensure no copyright infringement takes place.
Recent Developments
The film was initially scheduled to release on January 7, 2021, but was postponed due to increased Covid-19 cases. According to the director, if the numbers continued rising, the release of the movie would not be possible. On February 17, 2021, Lyca Productions acquired Tamil Nadu theatrical rights for RRR, and Pen Studios took over North Indian rights. The film is now set to release on July 30, 2021.
The film has received critical acclaim for its direction, cinematography, action sequences, script, music, and performances. It has earned international accolades and has become one of the top ten-grossing films in India. However, the film started trending on social media with many calling for a boycott in Karnataka due to the Kannada version being given less priority compared to Tamil, Telugu, and Hindi versions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the PIL against RRR filed in the Telangana High Court highlights the importance of public interest litigation as a legal tool for ensuring public participation in the judicial review of administrative actions that